Who can ever tell what lurks in the depths of the internet?
Five years ago, I wrote an article arguing that the idea of a âwarâ between science and religion is not a very helpful one, given that âall-out wars between neighbours tend to be pretty unpleasant, and the reality is that atheistic scientists have to share space in universities with scientifically literate religious believers and religiously committed scientistsâ. Although I was critical of some militantly atheistic scientists â such as one who regards religion as âintellectual terrorismâ and âmental weaknessâ â the general tone could hardly have been less inflammatory.
I have obviously written scores of articles since then and have hardly given that one much thought. But the other day, when I was searching for something else, I happened to come across where I was subjected to some pretty startling abuse.
I was accused of âpromoting a science-faith lovefestâ, being âpretty much biased against atheistsâ, and producing âtotally juvenileâ, âmassively tediousâŠbilgeâ, fit only for being âput in the recycling bin or better still in the cat litter trayâ. I was called âan assholeâ and a âso-called journalistâ who managed not only to âmiss the target when he shot his arrowâ but to send it in âthe wrong directionâ, where it âcame around and shot him square in the assâ.
Âé¶č
One contributor to the thread wondered whether I was âreally so blind or stupidâ or just âa manipulative prickâ. Another (donât tell my boss) was âshocked at such an appalling article being in the Times Higher Edâ. A third â best of all â suggested I was âlying for Jesusâ.
None of this was very pleasant to read, although it is pretty trivial compared with the kind of garbage women and minority groups have to put up with all the time. But what is really weird is just how distant it seems from what I actually wrote. Amid what strike me as a few valid criticisms and a few more I am happy to reflect on, torrents of bile were directed at me for minor irrelevancies, things I hadnât said (and donât believe) or comments I had quoted from others. Far from being âbiased against atheistsâ, I am â for what itâs worth â a pretty convinced atheist myself. And although I am sceptical about whether science and religion are engaged in a battle to the death, that hardly means I want to âpromote a lovefestâ.
Âé¶č
Nonetheless, I canât help taking pride in one rare ability I seem to possess: to manage to be both an arsehole and to shoot myself in the arse. I can only put it down to all the circus-skills training I had as a child.
Register to continue
Why register?
- Registration is free and only takes a moment
- Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
- Sign up for our newsletter
Subscribe
Or subscribe for unlimited access to:
- Unlimited access to news, views, insights & reviews
- Digital editions
- Digital access to °Ő±á·Ąâs university and college rankings analysis
Already registered or a current subscriber?




