Āé¶¹

THE Scholarly Web - 12 September 2013

Weekly transmissions from the blogosphere

Published on
September 12, 2013
Last updated
May 22, 2015

Last month, Times Higher Education published a list of the six questions that every academic has encountered during Q&A sessions at conferences – from ā€œThe Wandering Statementā€ toĀ ā€œThe Display of Superior Knowledgeā€.

We took the discussion online and used our Twitter feed to ask our 82,000 (and counting) followers to tell us some of the most memorable questions they had ever heard while attending an academic conference.

Some people, it seems, use the Q&A to be utterly dismissive of the speaker’s work. ā€œTell me, X, what was the point of your paper?ā€ was one question heard by Peter Stockwell, professor of literary linguistics at the University of Nottingham (). ā€œDoes what you’ve been talking about really matter?ā€ was another, recalled by Simon Knight, a PhD student at The Open University ().

Gerard Gorman, lecturer in earth science and engineering at Imperial College London, proved that some people simply miss the point. He heard a maths professor ask how it was possible to get results out of a supercomputer ā€œwithout a printer connected to itā€. The response in the conference hall? ā€œSilenceā€ and ā€œdisbeliefā€.

Āé¶¹

ADVERTISEMENT

Tommi Himberg (), a researcher at the Brain Research Unit of Aalto University in Finland, introduced a new genre of question: the ā€œjob applicationā€. This, he said, is ā€œasked by almost-PhDsā€ and includes ā€œlong intros about their workā€.

Some questions were blunt. ā€œMy favourite ever : ā€˜Don’t men get chlamydia?ā€™ā€ tweeted Rachel Forsyth, who works inĀ curriculum development and innovation at Manchester Metropolitan University.

Āé¶¹

ADVERTISEMENT

Others were pernickety. ā€œI wondered, could you go back nine slides? The fourth data point in the cluster to the left of the axis, are you sure it’s correct?ā€ was a question tweeted by Craig Holmes (), labour economist at the University of Oxford, who presumably has heard such nit-picking in action.

Some took the discussion away from traditional conferences. JoĀ Gavins (), senior lecturer in literary-linguistics at the University of Sheffield, recalled how one professor had said to a PhD student undertaking a public viva in the Netherlands: ā€œIĀ have a question in 6 parts. Do you want each part separately or all 6 at once?ā€

Setareh Chong (), biochemistry teaching fellow at the University of York, told the story of a presentation that was moving too quickly for one delegate.

After asking the speaker to slow down and being told that doing so would mean there would be no time to conclude the presentation, the questioner replied: ā€œI’d rather understand 100Ā per cent of 50 per cent of your data, than 0 per cent of 100Ā per cent.ā€

Āé¶¹

ADVERTISEMENT

Jamie Christie (), a research fellow at University College London, couldn’t recall any grating questions – but he has witnessed an audience start clapping during a talk in order to force the speaker to stop. ā€œHe was 10 mins into lunch!ā€

Jack Rosenberry (), journalism professor at StĀ John Fisher College, New York, has also seen speakers displaying less than impressive time awareness. ā€œOnce saw presenter with 40+ slides for 10 min presentation,ā€ he tweeted. ā€œWhat was he thinking?ā€

Send links to topical, insightful and quirky online comment by and about academics to chris.parr@tsleducation.com

Register to continue

Why register?

  • Registration is free and only takes a moment
  • Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
  • Sign up for our newsletter
Please
or
to read this article.

Sponsored

Featured jobs

See all jobs
ADVERTISEMENT