Last month, Times Higher Education published a list of the six questions that every academic has encountered during Q&A sessions at conferences ā from āThe Wandering Statementā toĀ āThe Display of Superior Knowledgeā.
We took the discussion online and used our Twitter feed to ask our 82,000 (and counting) followers to tell us some of the most memorable questions they had ever heard while attending an academic conference.
Some people, it seems, use the Q&A to be utterly dismissive of the speakerās work. āTell me, X, what was the point of your paper?ā was one question heard by Peter Stockwell, professor of literary linguistics at the University of Nottingham (). āDoes what youāve been talking about really matter?ā was another, recalled by Simon Knight, a PhD student at The Open University ().
Gerard Gorman, lecturer in earth science and engineering at Imperial College London, proved that some people simply miss the point. He heard a maths professor ask how it was possible to get results out of a supercomputer āwithout a printer connected to itā. The response in the conference hall? āSilenceā and ādisbeliefā.
Āé¶¹
Tommi Himberg (), a researcher at the Brain Research Unit of Aalto University in Finland, introduced a new genre of question: the ājob applicationā. This, he said, is āasked by almost-PhDsā and includes ālong intros about their workā.
Some questions were blunt. āMy favourite ever : āDonāt men get chlamydia?āā tweeted Rachel Forsyth, who works inĀ curriculum development and innovation at Manchester Metropolitan University.
Āé¶¹
Others were pernickety. āI wondered, could you go back nine slides? The fourth data point in the cluster to the left of the axis, are you sure itās correct?ā was a question tweeted by Craig Holmes (), labour economist at the University of Oxford, who presumably has heard such nit-picking in action.
Some took the discussion away from traditional conferences. JoĀ Gavins (), senior lecturer in literary-linguistics at the University of Sheffield, recalled how one professor had said to a PhD student undertaking a public viva in the Netherlands: āIĀ have a question in 6 parts. Do you want each part separately or all 6 at once?ā
Setareh Chong (), biochemistry teaching fellow at the University of York, told the story of a presentation that was moving too quickly for one delegate.
After asking the speaker to slow down and being told that doing so would mean there would be no time to conclude the presentation, the questioner replied: āIād rather understand 100Ā per cent of 50 per cent of your data, than 0 per cent of 100Ā per cent.ā
Āé¶¹
Jamie Christie (), a research fellow at University College London, couldnāt recall any grating questions ā but he has witnessed an audience start clapping during a talk in order to force the speaker to stop. āHe was 10 mins into lunch!ā
Jack Rosenberry (), journalism professor at StĀ John Fisher College, New York, has also seen speakers displaying less than impressive time awareness. āOnce saw presenter with 40+ slides for 10 min presentation,ā he tweeted. āWhat was he thinking?ā
Send links to topical, insightful and quirky online comment by and about academics to chris.parr@tsleducation.com
Register to continue
Why register?
- Registration is free and only takes a moment
- Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
- Sign up for our newsletter
Subscribe
Or subscribe for unlimited access to:
- Unlimited access to news, views, insights & reviews
- Digital editions
- Digital access to °Õ±į·”ās university and college rankings analysis
Already registered or a current subscriber?
