Āé¶¹

The feminine catch

Published on
December 22, 2016
Last updated
December 22, 2016

I just read your article on women in academia spending more time on being ā€œgood citizensā€, undertaking administrative tasks and so forth, than on gunning for their own research as men do, and hence women fail to match these men in getting promotion (ā€œFemale professors ā€˜pay price for academic citizenshipā€™ā€, News, 14 December).

I wanted to add the viewpoint of a shamelessly ambitious and brilliant (and child-free) female academic. I’ve been asked if I would like to dutifully chair the faculty and so on, and I have declined. I’ve pursued my research and changed my field – and I still haven’t been promoted.

The point about these stories – which can summed up as ā€œwomen aren’t doing the right thingsā€ – is that they let the hierarchies off the basic fact, which is that they look at someone like me and think ā€œthat doesn’t look like a professorā€.

I realise you were trying to make the point that we ought to value good citizenship, which would be great; but whether that happens or not, we need to acknowledge that not all women have feminine career patterns – and they are held back nonetheless.

Name and address provided


Send to

Letters should be sent to: THE.Letters@tesglobal.com
Letters for publication in Times Higher Education should arrive by 9am Monday.
View terms and conditions.

Register to continue

Why register?

  • Registration is free and only takes a moment
  • Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
  • Sign up for our newsletter
Please
or
to read this article.

Sponsored

Featured jobs

See all jobs
ADVERTISEMENT