Though most attacks on higher education communities occur in authoritarian countries, Western scholars would do well to look also at what is happening closer to home.
Free to Think 2021,ÌęÌęof the Scholars at Risk (SAR) Academic Freedom Monitoring Project, lists 332 such attacks in 65 countries. These include 110 cases of âkillings, violence [and] disappearanceâ and 101 cases of wrongful imprisonment, along with prosecution, âloss of positionâ and âtravel restrictionsâ, even though such documented examples constitute only âa fraction of attacks on higher education that have occurred over the past yearâ.
It is probably unsurprising that countries such as Afghanistan, Brazil, China, Myanmar, Turkey and Zimbabwe are well represented, but the report also flags up cases of intimidation and harassment in places far less well known for human rights abuses.
The office of Andrea Boudouvis, rector of the National Technical University of Athens, was vandalised by âa group of âhoodedâ individuals with hammers, crowbars, and paintâ protesting against âa plan to renovate a historic building on campus â one that had been used as an open meeting space for students and Athenians â into a research and conference centreâ. In France, âantisemitic and misogynistic images and messaging were used to hijack a virtual conference on feminist movements hosted by the University of Toulouse-Jean JaurĂšsâ. In the Netherlands, meanwhile, two scholars reported being intimidated by âa right-wing online activist groupâŠcommitted to breaking up the âleft hegemonyâ by exposing âleftistâ members of society and âmapping left-wing networksââ.
Âé¶č
Perhaps even more striking, the report, published on 9 December, includes 12 examples of âattacks on higher education communitiesâÌęthatÌętook place in the US between 1 September 2020 and 31 August 2021.
in Idaho, for example, âa law was passed that explicitly identified critical race theory as a threat to fundamental rights such as freedom of inquiry and expression, and respect for the dignity of othersâ. Legislation proposed in Louisiana, New Hampshire and Rhode Island went even further to âban the teaching of âdivisive conceptsâ, such as the idea that systemic racism existsâ. SAR, therefore, felt the need to âcall on US lawmakers and other political actors to refrain from efforts to dictate the content of teaching or research, including through legislative, executive, or private actionsâ.
Âé¶č
Free to ThinkÌę2021Ìęalso describes instances of unfair treatment that individual academics in the US, as in so many other countries, have faced.
A tenured professor at Linfield University in Oregon was âsummarily terminated after he publicly advocated on behalf of students and faculty who complained about alleged sexual abuse by members of the universityâs board of trusteesâ. A professor at Collin College in Texas was also fired âin apparent retaliation for expression critical of the collegeâs Covid-19 responseâ.
After setting out this catalogue of abuses, SAR offers a range of recommendations to âstates, higher education communities, and civil societyâ. At their heart, however, is unflinching âsupport for the principles that critical discourse is not disloyalty, that ideas are not crimes, and that everyone must be free to think, question, and share their ideasâ, whether across the globe or in the next street.
Register to continue
Why register?
- Registration is free and only takes a moment
- Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
- Sign up for our newsletter
Subscribe
Or subscribe for unlimited access to:
- Unlimited access to news, views, insights & reviews
- Digital editions
- Digital access to °Ő±á·Ąâs university and college rankings analysis
Already registered or a current subscriber?








