Āé¶¹

Canadian institute loses boss in showdown over high-risk science

University of British Columbia professor quits leadership of Peter Wall Institute for Advanced Studies in protest at funding reforms

Published on
November 26, 2018
Last updated
November 27, 2018
Tunnel
Source: Getty

A professor has resigned as the head of one of Canada’s leading interdisciplinary research centres, accusing the University of British Columbia of undercutting itsĀ missionĀ of cultivating open-ended high-risk scientific exploration.

Philippe Tortell, a professor of earth, ocean and atmospheric sciences at UBC, quit as director of the Peter Wall Institute for Advanced Studies after being ordered to accept changes that he saw as replicating ā€œtop-downā€ funding systems thatĀ favourĀ established scientists.

Those changes, Professor Tortell said, upended the basic point of the institute, created in 1991 with a C$15 million (Ā£8.8 million) donation from Mr Wall. The Vancouver real estate magnate, according to UBC’s president at the time, David Strangway,Ā Ā the venture ā€œto generate new ideas and initiatives that wouldn’t happen otherwiseā€.

While traditional university scientists and their funders tend to hew to paths of incremental discovery, ā€œwe were the ones that took chances on people who had really strange ideas, but very provocative ideasā€,Ā Professor Tortell said.

Āé¶¹

ADVERTISEMENT

TheĀ institute does that largely by creating a physical spaceĀ in which researchers from different disciplines can spend time together and share ideas without pressure for time-specific outputs.

But at a meeting this summer of the institute’s fiveĀ trusteesĀ and top UBC administrators – to which Professor Tortell saidĀ he was not invited – the board redirected much of the institute’s budget for open-ended basic research towards existing UBC funding channels.

Āé¶¹

ADVERTISEMENT

The trustees, he said, also eliminated three important institute programmes – for sponsoring international conferences, for hosting distinguished visiting professors, and for a Wall Solutions Initiative that aims to convert research findings intoĀ solutions toĀ real-world problems.

Overall, Professor Tortell said, the action by the five trustees – who includeĀ Mr Wall’s daughter Sonya and his nephew Bruno Wall, the current head of the family’s development company – cut or redirected about 75 per cent of the director’s discretionary budget authority. The vote, according to one trustee, was unanimous.

In a blog post announcing his departure, Professor TortellĀ wrote that he was ā€œdeeply troubled by this new approachā€ and warned that it ā€œposes an existential threat to the institute’s core mission, academic independence and capacity to catalyse truly innovative and creative researchā€.

ā€œI cannot, in good faith, continue to lead the institute towards a path with which I disagree profoundly, and one that I see as wholly inconsistent with its mission and mandate,ā€ he said.

Āé¶¹

ADVERTISEMENT

Santa Ono, UBC’s president, said that Professor Tortell’s resignation ā€œwas unexpected and is disappointingā€.

At a meeting of the UBC faculty senate, Professor Ono said that he did not intend any major change in the institute’s mission but conceded that the process of adjusting the budget priorities ā€œcould have been handled betterā€, according to political scientist Maxwell Cameron, who along with Professor Ono serves on the institute’s five-member board of trustees.

Other trustees feel similarly, Professor Cameron said. ā€œThere was never any question of infringing on academic freedom, but rather different visions of the role of the institute,ā€ he said. ā€œIt should have been possible to work those out, and we regret that did not happen.ā€

A UBC spokesman said that the closed trustees meeting was part of a year-long consultative process with Professor Tortell, in which he was asked for a strategic plan for the institute that more directly aligned with UBC’s objectives. At the time of that trustees meeting, Professor Tortell had produced a proposal that ā€œmoved in the direction suggested by theā€ trustees, but ā€œwas not financially sustainableā€, the spokesman said.

Āé¶¹

ADVERTISEMENT

Professor Tortell told Times Higher Education that the experience has left him concerned for the future of high-risk science at UBC.

ā€œThat’s a big part of what we do,ā€ he said. ā€œWe allow people – in fact we encourage people – to fail, because if you don’t fail, you’re not really trying that hard.ā€

Āé¶¹

ADVERTISEMENT

paul.basken@timeshighereducation.com

POSTSCRIPT:

Print headline: Director exits in ā€˜top-down’ funding row

Register to continue

Why register?

  • Registration is free and only takes a moment
  • Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
  • Sign up for our newsletter
Please
or
to read this article.

Related articles

Reader's comments (1)

ā€œ to generate new ideas and initiatives that wouldn’t happen otherwise ā€œ awesome vision !!! ...a unique construct with unique potential for ingenuities, privilege but also abuse. think the first two and the decision by board rings questionable . Think the third and the decision may seem less wrong if there is proof ... overt or otherwise .. of actual existence of abuse. Basil Jide fadipe.

Sponsored

Featured jobs

See all jobs
ADVERTISEMENT