David Willetts has resigned as minister for universities and science as David Cameron carries out a major cabinet reshufffle that has also seen Michael Gove lose his job as education secretary.
The news follows speculation on a number of previous occasions that Mr Willetts was at risk of losing the universities brief, and comes as part of a wider change in government with a number of long-serving ministers losing their jobs.
It was announced on 15 July that he is to be replaced by Greg Clark, MP for Tunbridge Wells, who will also hold the post of minister of state at the Cabinet Office.
Mr Willetts, who has overseen four years of major reform in higher education and was also shadow universities minister before 2010, has announced that he intends to leave Parliament next year.
Âé¶č
Figures from the UK higher education sector have been reacting to the news.
Pam Tatlow, chief executive of the Million+ group of universities, said Mr Willetts was âstrong advocate of higher education, science and the merits of international students and waged a long battle in the Cabinet on their behalfâ.
Âé¶č
âWhat is not so widely known is that he won the argument that international students should be taken out of the migration numbers only to have the Cabinet agreement scuppered by the Home Office, which announced something completely different.
âIt is unusual for ministers tasked with introducing highly controversial reforms to be remembered fondly but David Willetts ticked the boxes in terms of integrity, and as a result won respect even among those who were strongly opposed to the governmentâs policies.â
Paul Nurse, president of the Royal Society, said he had been âan outstanding science minister, respected not only in the UK but throughout the worldâ.
âHe has kept science centre stage in the Cabinet and has helped position science at the forefront of UK industrial strategy and economic recovery. His commitment, energy and pure enthusiasm for science will be sorely missed.â
On Twitter, Mark Pegg, former chief executive of the Leadership Foundation for Higher Education, described the departing minister as a âvery rare example of a minister who actually cared what happened to his brief and not just his careerâ.
Nick Hillman, director of the Higher Education Policy Institute and former special adviser to Mr Willetts, said it was ânice to see plauditsâ on the social network for his former employer, âincluding from people who disagree with himâ, adding âhe was an inspiring bossâ.
However, Rachel Wenstone, former vice-president for higher education at the National Union of Students, tweeted that Mr Willetts would be remembered for âhis inability to challenge [home secretary Theresa] May on net migrationâ, and âincompetent funding decisionsâ.
Aaron Porter, who was president of the NUS when tuition fees were increased to ÂŁ9,000, tweeted that Mr Willetts would be remembered for a âbig errorâ regarding the resource accounting and budgeting (RAB) charge â the estimated portion of loans that will never be repaid by graduates, which has increased to a level that could soon eclipse the expected financial benefits of the fee increase. He added that the former minister was a âdecent manâ, but that his reforms âwill need correcting in 2015â.
Âé¶č
Andy Westwood, chief executive of GuildHE, said Mr Willettsâ biggest legacy would âalways be the increase in fees and the funding system that underpins itâ and whether it turns out to be sustainable.
âBut he deserves credit for a wide range of things: protecting the science budget - even if only in flat cash terms - and for persuading George Osborne and the Treasury that they should expand HE numbers and get rid of number controls,â he said.
âAt GuildHE we will always be especially grateful for his decision that enabled a number of small and specialist institutions to gain university title.â
University leaders also took to social media to pay tribute to the outgoing minister. Craig Calhoun, director of the London School of Economics, said Mr Willettsâ departure was âa loss as UKâs universities and science ministerâ, describing him as âa thoughtful leader whether one agreed with all his policies or notâ, while Sir Richard J. Evans, president of Wolfson College, Cambridge, said he was âsorry David Willetts is leaving his postâ. âI hope his replacement also values universities,â he tweeted.
Âé¶č
Patrick McGhee, former vice-chancellor of the University of East London, tweeted that the fees reforms had âbeen a disaster, but [Mr Willetts] genuinely believed in a diverse sector, students, mobility and the importance of teachingâ.
âMy worry is that a new HE minister will have a remit to keep the cost of HE via loans down. This could be bad news for the post-92 sector,â Professor McGhee said.
David Willetts won acclaim from many in the science community during his four years as minister.
He won a cash ring-fence for the science budget â although many have raised concerns at how inflation is now eroding this settlement â and helped to boost long-term investments in science capital after initial cuts.
Jeremy Farrar, director of the Wellcome Trust, expressed gratitude at his âtireless workâ and for âproving himself a progressive force in the argument for open access to researchâ.
âHis common sense and clear commitment to research and higher education has been a breath of fresh air. He will be sadly missed across government,â he said.
Sir Colin Blakemore, professor of neuroscience and philosophy at the University of London, added that the scientific community owed Mr Willetts âa huge debtâ.
âDespite the fact that heâs not a scientist, he went native. His personal affection and enthusiasm for science have been crucially important in sustaining the governmentâs commitment to science through challenging times,â he said.
Imran Khan, chief executive of the British Science Association, said that he is âone of the UKâs sharpest and most talented politiciansâ and that âyouâd be hard-pressed to find many in our sector who have a bad word to say about himâ.
One of Mr Willettsâ more controversial policy decisions was to channel ÂŁ600 million of investment into selected innovations, known as his eight great technologies.
Many criticised the move for âpicking winnersâ by concentrating research and development funding in specific fields while other promising technologies missed out.
But Iain Gray, chief executive of the Technology Strategy Board, said that the eight great technologies policy has âhelped mobilise the joint efforts of universities and business working togetherâ.
Sarah Main, director of the Campaign for Science and Engineering, said of Mr Willetts: âHe was liked and respected throughout the sector for âgetting itâ, whether each policy was welcomed or not.
âHe has set the scene for his successor to capitalise on the high level political support for science he engendered by securing substantial long-term investment.â
Âé¶č
Holly Else
Register to continue
Why register?
- Registration is free and only takes a moment
- Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
- Sign up for our newsletter
Subscribe
Or subscribe for unlimited access to:
- Unlimited access to news, views, insights & reviews
- Digital editions
- Digital access to °Ő±á·Ąâs university and college rankings analysis
Already registered or a current subscriber?
