What are you reading? – June 2020
A look over the shoulders of our scholar-reviewers

A look over the shoulders of our scholar-reviewers

Fee and subsidy reshuffle curbs universities’ capacity to support their research, but proposed funds could help bridge the gap

With the key selling point of university – meeting people and having a ‘great experience’ – now gone, Andreas Schleicher sees high fees as unjustified and calls for more government investment

Increasing numbers of postgraduates appears to be a win-win, with graduates seeking refuge from a poor job market and universities able to make up for lost income, but there are concerns over the...

Doctoral graduates’ occupation of Higher Education Ministry will do little by itself to solve a structural problem, says Kenneth Nsah

But local experts lament that recommendations in the US-produced document may be easier said than done  Â

Stephen Thomson outlines his evidence of ‘letterhead bias’ in legal academic publishing and suggests ways to dismantle it

Moving paper tests online increases access and security problems. Rather, online exams should be ‘digital first’, says Burr SettlesÂ

Universities must put as much effort into equality and diversity strategies as they do into other areas, say leading academics

While Australia’s fee and subsidy reshuffle favours job-growth areas, student and institutional recalcitrance may blunt its impact

Casual staff start marking boycott over failure to extend contracts, move seen as having outsized impact on BAME and female academics

Government’s proposals are contradictory and will torpedo its jobs agenda, humanities lobby warns

With student choice relied on to free up money for more university places, critics question the strategy and potential impacts

Rishi Trikha says his experiences of racism and homophobia in a conservatoire show that creative fields have to be part of anti-racism conversations, too

First release of Graduate Outcomes, which looks at what people are doing 15 months after leaving university, shows stark differences for some groups Â